tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jan 21 01:15:35 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Qong (was Re: Hech)

ja' SuStel:
>...but then there's also no grammatical reason why some noun can't be
>the object of, say, /Qong/.  /quS vIQong/ is a grammatical and nonsensical

I find it fascinating that {Qong} is the verb typically chosen for such
examples.  In the introduction to verb prefixes, TKD actually *does* tell
us that some verbs don't take objects -- and it uses {Qong} when saying so!

-- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh

Back to archive top level