tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 26 11:53:17 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

-lu'wI' (was: Re: agentive -wI')

> but it does appear in ghIlghameS: 
> leghbe'lu'wI' = "unseen". So it IS out there, isn't it?

Hey, where did that come from?
And to think I'm one of those that doesn't like -lu'wI'.
And that got past me, the proofreaders, the editor, and those (few?) that have 
read the book, with no comment about that usage. (And some of the readers were 
paying attention because they did question other usages (not wrong usages, just 
maybe weird)).


Back to archive top level