tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Feb 11 19:40:13 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: omitting {lu-}

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: omitting {lu-}
• Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:40:07 EST

In a message dated 2/7/2002 8:43:26 AM Mountain Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:


> but can {qev} be transitive?
> 

I have no reservations about qev, it can be transitive.  Have I heard it used 
somewhere on Okrandian material, I can't remember?

peHruS

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: omitting {lu-}
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Artificial "real" languages (was Re: pIqaD)
• Next by Date: RE: KLBC: SajmeywIj
• Prev by thread: Re: omitting {lu-}
• Next by thread: Re: omitting {lu-}
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level