tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Dec 30 15:08:32 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KBLC
SuStel:
> That's not quite right. When /neH/ follows a verb, is trivializes the
> verb.
Hmm... Thats what I meant, but I didn't know how to express it; and since
I'm not home during the holidays I don't have my books with me for quotations
:-(
> If it CAN take an object, I can't think of any object
> more likely than /'e'/.
So you mean - theoretically - we can say "I dream *that*..." but not "I
dream *it*."
{qeylIS vIghom 'e' vInaj}
"I dreamt that I met kahless" could work,
*{qeylIS vInaj}*
"I dreamt kahless" doesn't work, because then the definition of {naj}
would have been "dream of"!
Quvar
ghojwI'pu'lI' tISaH
--
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++
NEU: Mit GMX ins Internet. Rund um die Uhr für 1 ct/ Min. surfen!
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: KBLC
- From: "David Trimboli" <SuStel@hotmail.com>
- References:
- Re: KBLC
- From: "David Trimboli" <SuStel@hotmail.com>