tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Aug 29 23:51:00 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: two different types of object

• From: Qov <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: two different types of object
• Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 21:45:16 -0700
• In-Reply-To: <3XMIUTLKYX61X04EDCA54XTUSLKMNJ.3d6e95b8@pc>
• References: <[email protected]>

At 23:44 02-08-29 +0200, Quvar wrote:
>DloraH:
> >How about che- ?
>
>qorDu'wIj jIH je chequvmoH
>"my family and me, you honor us"
>
>sounds okay. I didn't think about that one.
>Probably because "them" plus "me" is not always "us".

When is them plus me not us?

I know there are languages that have more than one second person plural, 
depending on, for example, whether the speaker is including the person 
addressed, but Klingon has only one second person plural. 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: two different types of object
    • From: Qov <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: two different types of object
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: two different types of object
    • From: Quvar valer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: cc: Get the Child Support You Deserve! 30.45
• Next by Date: Re: two different types of object
• Prev by thread: Re: two different types of object
• Next by thread: Re: two different types of object
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level