tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Aug 17 19:19:36 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

RE: patlh <A> qaDmey: not good enough to even be KLBC

> >> bIHvam jIloSmo', jISot 'ej jIjotHa'.
> >
> >Prefix.  /bIHvam/ is the object of /loS/.
> >bIHvam vIloSmo' ...
> I think the English confused me here. Because in English you wait 
> _for_ something (unless you await it),
> I think I subconsciously wanted to put bIHvamvaD jIloSmo'. Never mind.

loS is glossed as "wait (for)"; both ways work.

> >> 'ach Do' pa' jIHaD neH.
> >> Fortunately, it [Cambridge] wants me to study there anyway.
> >The klingon is correct, but when I read it, I read the neH as "only,
> >merely".
> >That darn /neH/.
> wa' DoS wIqIp. But is the <'ach> suitable for "anyway"? When I 
> read this back, it strikes me as:
> "But fortunately, it wants me to study there."

It seems ok to me.

DloraH, BG

Back to archive top level