tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Aug 14 11:27:45 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Aw: Re: Aw: Re: adverbials
>ja'chuqtaHvIS tulwI' HomDoq je ...
>>>> I simply wanted to know whether it is possible to see it that way
>>>> without damaging the language, so to speak.
>>> of course one cannot judge this until you make a mistake
>>> which results from your model of the language being different
>>> than that of the majority of speakers...
>> i thought you expert klingons can see that immediately. :)
>DaH SIbI' tlhIngan Hol yIlo'choH. bIjatlhchu'chugh, vaj ram patlIj.
>bIjatlhHa'chugh, vaj pat chu' yI'ogh qoj yIlaj, ghIq yIjatlhchoHchu'.
>Or, in other words, peja'chuq 'e' yImev, pejatlh neH.
qatlh vaj ram patwIj?
'ach qaSlaHtaHvIS Hoch, bIlugh. tlhIngan Hol vIjatlhchoH vIneH.
'ach muDajtaH pab.