tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Apr 28 20:57:00 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: KLBC: jIrop

• From: "DloraH" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: KLBC: jIrop
• Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 20:56:55 -0400
• Importance: Normal
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

> Did you respond to my previous message <<jIrop>>?
> If you did, I didn't receive the email.

Sorry this reply took so long..


> vaghHu' jIvemDI' 'oy'qu' tIqwIj.  nom Qel vIghoS.  vInuDchu'lu'.  tIqwIj
> toblu'.  "pericarditis"mo' jIbechtaH 'e' tu' Qel; rIQ tIqwIj DIrqoq.  Do'
> qabqu'be' Segh vIghajbogh.  qaStaHvIS wa' jaj neH ropyaHDaq jIH.  'ach
> Herghmey HoSghaj vISopnIS.  loQ jIvumlaH, 'ach Herghmo'
> jIDoy'qu'.  jIyepnIS.
>  wa'Hu' jIyepHa'taHvIS, tlhoS jIQongtaH, 'ej tlhoS muqIp Duj.
>
> jatlh Qel, <<qaSpu'DI' wa' jar, bIpIvqa'.>>  lugh 'e' vItul.
>
> -Sengval

I guess I didn't respond in the first place because when I read it back then
I didn't see anything wrong and so maybe it just didn't register as a KLBC.
You did an excellent job.  Very good use of suffixes.

DloraH, BG

• References:
  • KLBC: jIrop
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Spam from KLI list
• Next by Date: RE: jabbI'IDwIj Qav
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC: jIrop
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: jIrop
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level