tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Apr 12 00:14:20 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: to' nech

From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: to' nech
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 23:14:30 -0500
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]><[email protected]>

ja' "Sean M. Burke" <[email protected]>:
>I think you misunderstand what I'm doing.  I'm not translating the /Oblique
>Strategies/ into Klingon.  I'm translating them into the /original/ Klingon.
>That is, I'm trying to produce a Klingon text such that the Eno/Schmidt
>/Oblique Strategies/ reads like a smart, artistic, but at times quite
>interpretive translation of the Klingon.

wejpuH.  choja' jImughtaHbe'.  toH, bom DIb DapoQ'a'?

Be warned:  if artistic interpretation is your explicit goal, you're
probably going to find your posts virtually ignored by many of the people
here who would otherwise be glad to comment on more straightforward
translations.

-- ghunchu'wI'

Follow-Ups:
- Re: to' nech
  - From: "Sean M. Burke" <[email protected]>

References:
- to' nech, 021: {lojmIt yISoQmoH; Hur yItu'.}
  - From: "Sean M. Burke" <[email protected]>
- Re: to' nech, 021: {lojmIt yISoQmoH; Hur yItu'.}
  - From: "Sean M. Burke" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: ghorghvaD 'oH?
Next by Date: Re: ghorghvaD 'oH?
Prev by thread: Re: to' nech, 021: {lojmIt yISoQmoH; Hur yItu'.}
Next by thread: Re: to' nech
Index(es):