tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Sep 18 14:15:17 2001

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

'op puS qechmey vIghaj

• From: Will Martin <[email protected]>
• Subject: 'op puS qechmey vIghaj
• Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 15:02:14 -0400

mu' <<'op>> vIqel. 'op law' lo'mey vIqel. 'op puS vIwuq.

Consider the following progression:

pagh
'op puSqu'
'op puS
'op
'op law'
'op law'qu'
HochHom
Hoch

Could we also consider {paghHom}?

Is this interesting to anyone?

charghwI'

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: 'op puS qechmey vIghaj
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: chunbe' USA
• Next by Date: Pronouns
• Prev by thread: Re: chunbe' USA
• Next by thread: Re: 'op puS qechmey vIghaj
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level