tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Sep 12 12:50:35 2001
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: laj (was Re: jaS bIpotlh
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: laj (was Re: jaS bIpotlh
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 13:40:05 -0400
>From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
>Another concern is that you often use constructions that are controversial,
>or speak with a looseness of grammar that makes the reader have to *figure
>out* what you meant -- you didn't necessarily say it that way.
That seems fascist; let me clarify that: by no means am I saying that you
cannot employ these controversial constructions. I'm simply trying to point
out why some people will become confused when you use them.
SuStel
Stardate 1699.5
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp