tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Oct 19 22:34:21 2001

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: QamvIS Hegh, torvIS yIn



[QamvIS Hegh qaq law, torvIS yIn qaq puS.]

ja' SuStel:
>This is a really weird sentence.  What is it doing?  Are /Hegh/ and /yIn/
>nouns or verbs?  If nouns, the law'/puS construction isn't too strange, but
>the you've got a subordinate clause modifying a noun, not a verb.

They're definitely nouns.  I believe {Hegh} as a noun appears in TKD's
addendum, showing that it was added in that sense for ST6.

ja' Voragh:
>Although Okrand analyzed it as:
>  "Dying while standing is preferable to living while kneeling"
>in TKW (p.95), it makes more sense to me viewing them as nouns:
>  "Death while standing is preferable to life while kneeling"

"Dying" and "living" *are* nouns, aren't they?

>A better working explanation is that this proverb contains a survival of how
>{-vIS} worked in older Klingon, before Klingons started adding {-taH} to it,
>for reasons which are still unexplained.

My pet theory regarding this proverb is that the Type 9 verb suffix {-vIS}
is being used in a way similar to {-meH} when modifying nouns.  But
whatever the underlying grammar, it's basically an exceptional case.

-- ghunchu'wI'


Back to archive top level