tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Oct 08 14:45:37 2001

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Artificial languages (was RE: Enterprise)

>Klingon. I am still looking for another language like Klingon though,
>meaning a full language that was not intended to be easy to learn
>(like Esperanto & Co). Huttish and Gargish unfortunately weren't what
>I was looking for, and I have the impression that there are two
>versions of Vulcan (?). Any suggestions?

Hi Daniela. Your paper sounds very interesting. I would like to suggest a 
couple of conlangs for you. 1) LÁADAN, the language designed to better 
express the female point of view (very naturalistic but highly 
differentiated from English), and 2) LOJBAN, the only language successfully 
designed to be wholly devoid of syntactic ambiguity (far more difficult for 
a human to learn, however; more suitable for programmer/hacker-types and 
their computers, I've heard, tho people do use it for common communication). 
Both of these languages have references easily found on the web.

I would like to read your paper when it's done. Please publish soon!!

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

Back to archive top level