tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jun 18 01:15:15 2001
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: To be or not to be Belanna
- From: SuSvaj <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: To be or not to be Belanna
- Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 22:06:28 -0500
At 11:58 PM 06/17/2001 +0200, you wrote:
>qIroS wrote:
>
>> tlhIngan Hol was deemed inappropriate to include in the ISO codings,
>> despite the application being backed by the KLI.
>>
>> It seems therefore that at least one (professional?) body of people
>> disregard tlhIngan Hol as a real language.
It is unquestionably "real" it's just not "natural." That is, a natural
language. I don't know if that fact helps or not. It all depends on the
law of her land. There may be no precedent for this.
SuSvaj