tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jan 18 22:33:26 2001

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Grammar Highlight Each Day (he/she/it as subject)

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: Grammar Highlight Each Day (he/she/it as subject)
• Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 01:33:06 EST

In a message dated 1/11/2001 11:35:51 AM Central Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:


> in the light of recent GHEDs, it makes me wonder why you don't
> mention first and second person objects here...
> mulegh, Dulegh, nulegh and lIlegh don't seem so far out...
> so, any particular reason?
> 

meq vIghaj.  jIQaghpu'.  jIQaghchu'pu'.  jItlhIj.  HIvqa' yabwIj qab.  
bIlugh.  potlh je wotmeyvetlh, 'ach jIlImpu'.  tugh jISawmo' jISey'.  Marina* 
'oH pongDaj'e'.  teH,  'oDwI' (Pam Brown) ghaHbe'bej.  jItlhIjqa'taH!

peHruS QInnor puqloD

tlhIHvaD jIqaD:  nuq 'oS mu' {QInnor}?

peHruS

• Prev by Date: Re: -vo'
• Next by Date: Klingon dates
• Prev by thread: Re: Grammar Highlight Each Day (he/she/it as subject)
• Next by thread: Klingon WOTD: is possible to give a small number of examples. A {bang pong} is formed by attaching {-oy}, the suffix indicating endearment, to an everyday noun. Most of the resulting terms make very little sense to anyone not in the particular relationship, and none translates well. Some pet terms are based on words for kinds of food, such as {chatlhoy} and {'awje'oy}. Perhaps ()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level