tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Apr 01 22:17:18 2001

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: Quch bom

• From: Qov <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: Quch bom
• Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 22:18:47 -0700

If you are recording this for the future in any published form, you might
want to reconsider the word order in line 3. Without {-'e'} on the direct
object, the adverbial is misplaced. Fortunately, moving it doesn't hurt the
scan.

Doj.

SarrIS

> "Quch bom" (or "Marc, we love you anyway")
>
> tlhIngan nach 'et mu'mey vImuch.
> veng wa'DIchDaq qarchu' Quch.
> Sep veb chaq Dab roghvaH 'IQ:

DopDaq qul yIchenmoH QobDI' ghu'.

vIqontaHvIS <Sep vebDaq chaq ...> vIqon.  DaH wot vIwIvta'bogh vIlIj, 'ach
wot vIchoHmoHDI', mu'tlhegh naQ vIlISbe'ba'.  

Dap bom 'oH neH.  mu'mey vIghojmeH vIqon.  lIHaghmoHmeH vIlab.  botIvchugh,
jIbel.  loQ mumogh ghu'.  Soch Quch 'oSbogh mu'mey 'agh matlh, mu'mey
lI''e' wIHutlhtaHvIH.  bItlhaQ, matHa'.  tlhoy bItlhaQchugh chaq pIjoy'.
Qov

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Quch bom
    • From: "Will Martin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: cheghwI'
• Next by Date: matHa'/matlh
• Prev by thread: RE: Quch bom
• Next by thread: RE: Quch bom
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level