tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Mar 24 11:30:37 2000
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: KLBC: An Introduction and some questions...
- From: Marc Paige <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: KLBC: An Introduction and some questions...
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 13:30:02 -0600
>>>
-----Original Message-----
From: Andeen, Eric [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 7:21 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: KLBC: An Introduction and some questions...
> The idea is "Black Growler" -- loosely translating {bey} as
<vIpe'ta'>
> My idea -- which I realized was not "authorized" by anything
> explicit in canon -- was {*beywI' qIj*}. I originally dropped
<vIpe'ta'>
pagh
Beginners' Grammarian
<<<
'a *neHjej* neHjejna' pongbe'lu'chugh, DuQbe''a'. pongna' 'oHbej pong'e' 'ej
pongna' 'oHbej *beywI' qIj*'e'. pabnISbe' pongmey, qar'a'? QIch 'oH
pongmey'e' neH. chaq *beywI'qIj* Dapong qar'a'. pongwIj yIqel.
---
a thistle by another other name still pricks. A name is a name and *beywI'
qIj* is certainly a name. Names do not need to be grammatical, right? They
are just vocalizations. Perhaps, you could even name it *beywI'qIj*!
Say'IluD
vIt, batlh, yIn