tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jun 09 19:13:16 2000
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: KLBC: Hoch DaHjaj mu'mey vIwaHqa'qu'.
- From: Eric Andeen <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: KLBC: Hoch DaHjaj mu'mey vIwaHqa'qu'.
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 19:13:34 -0700
jatlh tuv'el:
> ...
>
> I struggled with the <-taH> after <'e'>, but it seemed
> to make sense. I guess I could have used <-DI'>... ghIq
> Sam 'e' nIDDI' wIbejlaH. Or is that even worse?
That works. <-vIS> is better than <-DI'>, but is safe. I personally would
just use <-taHvIS> and not worry about it, but that's just me.
pagh