tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jan 26 11:15:30 2000
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: meqleH (again)
Well said!
[email protected] wrote:
> jatlh charghwI':
> >
> > I can't just sit here and let this kind of speculation go
> > unchallenged. This is absurd.
>
> bIlugh. tlhoy jIloy. It was a shot in the dark with no
> basis in canon, and I said as much.
>
> > You might as well consider
> > {meqleH} to be derived from {meq} and {leH} to say that it
> > is the device one uses to maintain reason.
>
> vaj... "meq"-"leH"-na' 'oH "Occam" tajHom'e'!
>
> > charghwI'
>
> --
> De'vID
>
> -------------------------------
> Beam to http://www.StarTrek.com
> Now featuring the Star Trek Store and
> the official site for Star Trek: Insurrection.
> ------------------------------