tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 25 16:25:25 2000
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: meqleH (again)
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: meqleH (again)
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 19:24:38 -0500 (EST)
jatlh charghwI':
>
> I can't just sit here and let this kind of speculation go
> unchallenged. This is absurd.
bIlugh. tlhoy jIloy. It was a shot in the dark with no
basis in canon, and I said as much.
> You might as well consider
> {meqleH} to be derived from {meq} and {leH} to say that it
> is the device one uses to maintain reason.
vaj... "meq"-"leH"-na' 'oH "Occam" tajHom'e'!
> charghwI'
--
De'vID
-------------------------------
Beam to http://www.StarTrek.com
Now featuring the Star Trek Store and
the official site for Star Trek: Insurrection.
------------------------------