tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jan 07 16:29:25 2000
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Which is more important? (KLBC)
- From: Nicolau Rodrigues <[email protected]>
- Subject: Which is more important? (KLBC)
- Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 16:46:50 -0500
I was writing a letter for a friend in Klingon, and I wrote: "I hope you are fine in the big city that is Madrid", I translated it as:
{*Madrid* 'oHbogh veng tInDaq bIpIv 'e' vItul}.
Then I noted that {veng} was, at the same time, the locative of the relative clause and, also, the subject of the copulative. Thus, {veng} would take {-'e'} as subject, but as locative it's unnecessary and the meaning of the sentence doesn't emphasizes that noun.
My question is: Which function is more important, a locative or a subject of a copulative?
Should it be as I wrote or should it be:
{*Madrid* 'oHbogh veng'e' tInDaq bIpIv 'e' vItul}?
If this is the right option, can a noun sintagma formed by two nouns take two suffixes of the same type, one in every noun?
ghaHbe'wI' //// Nicolau
_________________________________________________________
Enviado desde http://www.LatinMail.com. Tu correo latino.