tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Feb 25 06:45:32 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: tlhoy SoQ mughlu' (was RE: KLIC - qaStaH'a'?)



On Thu, 24 Feb 2000 23:51:10 -0500 Alan Anderson 
<[email protected]> wrote:
> ja' DloraH:
> >qep'a' javDIchDaq SoQ bomughHa' SoH be'Hom je
> 
> Qo'!  vImughHa'be'chu'!  vImughchu'.  vImughchu'qu'.  tlhoy vImugh neH. :-)
> 
> >SoQvetlh tlhaQ HIngeH
> 
> vInej.  vISamchugh, vIngeHqang.  jav Hu' DaHevpu'be'chugh, HIboj.

jav Hu' Hevpu'chugh qatlh DangeHmeH Dutlhobpu'? <<jav leS>> 
Dalo' 'e' DaHechlaw'. bIDoy'law'. chaq DaqImHa'moHlu'.
 
> >= Do the rules require a word-for-word translation
> >or just express the IDEA?
> 
> They should probably express the idea clearly, especially if a literal
> translation fails to get across any subtleties in the Klingon.  But if
> you grow weary of having to say everything twice, maybe a word-for-word
> translation would be okay.  Actually, considering the target group, it
> would probably be a good idea to find out how *they* want to read it.

bIqeSchu'.
 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh

charghwI' 'utlh



Back to archive top level