tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 22 15:21:41 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: mu' qID subgenres

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: mu' qID subgenres
• Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 16:34:53 EST

jatlh SuStel:
>I'm amazed that no one
>has mentioned the most obvious of all of these:
>'ej/je
>qoj/joq
>pagh/ghap

Hmm. I've never thought of this as a pun. I've always considered this to be 
simply an interesting lexicological feature of the Klingon language.


- DujHoD

• Prev by Date: RE: cha'DIch vInID
• Next by Date: RE: lengwI' vIyaj vIneH.
• Prev by thread: Re: mu' qID subgenres
• Next by thread: Re: mu' qID subgenres
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level