tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Feb 18 10:11:41 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: ghargh ngaSwI'

• From: "Andeen, Eric" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: ghargh ngaSwI'
• Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 11:12:40 -0700

ghItlh De'vID:
> Qu'vatlh!  nuq vIta'?  ghargh ngaSwI' vIpoSmoH rIntaH!

jatlh Lawrence:
> "ghargh ngaSwI' vIpoSmoH." not mu'tlheghvam vIyaj. 
> mu'mey vIyajchu', chenDI' jImiSchoH. ghIHba' gharghmey 
> 'ach ngaSwI'Daq vIlanqa'laHchugh qaybe'. QIt vIH. jIQapbej.

> not tlhInganpu'vaD Qatlh gharghmey, 'ach Heghchugh 'IQqu'.

DISoppa' Heghchugh, vaj 'IQba' ghu'. 'ach DISopta'DI' Heghba', 'ej QaQtaH
ghu'.

> SKI: Random musings on an expression that never made much 
> sense to me in English, and less so in Klingon.

vIyajbe'taH je jIH.

pagh

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RE: ghargh ngaSwI'
    • From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: <<KLIC>> bomuv boneH'a'?
• Next by Date: RE: DawI' and -ghach
• Prev by thread: RE: ghargh ngaSwI'
• Next by thread: Re: RE: ghargh ngaSwI'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level