tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Aug 29 00:21:14 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [KLBC] [The Raven] Part 4 Some mistakes

From: Tremal-Naik <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [KLBC] [The Raven] Part 4 Some mistakes
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 09:28:43 +0200
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from [email protected] on Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 07:29:40PM -0400
Mail-Followup-To: [email protected]
References: <[email protected]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 07:29:40PM -0400, [email protected] wrote:

>>*terror* Dunqu'vaD not vIHotbogh muteb.

mughIjbogh vay''e' vIHotbe'pu'bogh muteb

What do you think about this? I don't know if it's canon using a
relative clause as object of another relative clause, but it sound good
to me...

-- 
Tremal-Naik -- [email protected] -- GnuPGid: 0xBEB04EDB
E.A. Poe Klingon Translation Project: http://web.tiscalinet.it/tremal
Join "tlhIngan Hol in Italy" mailing list - Send a mail for information

References:
- Re: [KLBC] [The Raven] Part 4 Some mistakes
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: Re: [KLBC] [The Raven] Part 4 Some mistakes
Next by Date: HIvje''a' qoq
Prev by thread: qoq HIvje''a' (was: Re: HIvje''a' qoq)
Next by thread: Re: [KLBC] [The Raven] Part 4 Some mistakes
Index(es):