tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Sep 07 09:44:28 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: mu'qaD Etymology
- From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: mu'qaD Etymology
- Date: Tue, 07 Sep 1999 11:42:52 -0500
At 12:00 PM 9/6/99 -0400, charghwI' wrote:
> I mean, I
>can quickly think of one classic English curse that refers to a
>shared bodily function I happen to be rather FOND of. Why should
>THAT be a CURSE?
toH, meqvam vISov! {mup} 'oS no' DIvI' Hol mu' *focken*!, vaj
<yImup'egh> (chaq <Dumupjaj vay'>) <yIngagh'egh> je 'oS
*F*** you!*.
-- ter'eS