Re: KLBC: mu'qaD Etymology

[Terrence Donnelly <pag000@mail.connect.more.net>]

At 12:00 PM 9/6/99 -0400, charghwI' wrote:
> I mean, I 
>can quickly think of one classic English curse that refers to a 
>shared bodily function I happen to be rather FOND of. Why should 
>THAT be a CURSE? 

toH, meqvam vISov!  {mup} 'oS no' DIvI' Hol mu' *focken*!, vaj
<yImup'egh> (chaq <Dumupjaj vay'>)  <yIngagh'egh> je 'oS 
*F*** you!*.

-- ter'eS