tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Nov 05 14:58:12 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: jubluH'a'?

• From: "d'Armond Speers" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: jubluH'a'?
• Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 15:38:14 -0700

> {vaj} is an adverb, not a conjunction. 

[...]

> > We also have "'ach", which means "however, but." 
> 
> This is a conjunction, not an adverb. Sometimes it is used like 
> {'e'} is sometimes used, referring to a sentence someone else 
> said, but just as {'e'} ties together two immediately adjacent 
> sentences, so does {'ach}. In this way {'e'} acts as an odd 
> conjunction that does not necessarily appear between the 
> sentences. 

{'e'} is a pronoun, not a conjunction.  :)

--Holtej 'utlh

tlhIngan Hol mailing list FAQ
http://www.bigfoot.com/~dspeers/klingon/faq.htm
 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RE: jubluH'a'?
    • From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: "entropy" (was Re: jubluH'a'?)
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC: Undoubtedly continue to..
• Prev by thread: Re: jubluH'a'?
• Next by thread: Re: RE: jubluH'a'?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level