tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon May 24 15:03:48 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: SachtaH Holmaj!
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: SachtaH Holmaj!
- Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 18:03:08 EDT
In a message dated 5/13/1999 9:47:35 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
<< I think that peHruS is confused by the phrase {jatlhmeH mIwmey} "speaking
procedures". The plural noun {mIwmey} is not the subject of the dependent
verb {jatlh} but the plural object of the main verb {qel}. >>
===========
peHruS would like to have been reading mIwmey as only the object of the verb
qel all along. But, I recall several accusations aimed at me about not
including a head noun to a dependent clause. So, I indirectly questioned
what the head noun would be if not mIwmey in a double role.
peHruS