tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon May 24 14:47:44 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: SachtaH Holmaj!
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: SachtaH Holmaj!
- Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 17:47:07 EDT
In a message dated 5/12/1999 7:40:20 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
<< ><< <> jatlhmeH mIwmey qel wa'
> nav. >>
>==============
>Just a question about using the verb prefix {lu-}. Would it fit on {jatlh}
>in the sentence above? Would the entire phrase <> be considered a singular
>object in tlhIngan Hol?
I'd say the <> phrase is a direct quote, even in a {-meH}clause. Thus the no
object prefix, in this case the null prefix is required. >>
==========
Then, there remains the question of what is the head noun of the {-meH}
clause. It appears obvious to me in this sentence the head noun of the
clause is {mIwmey}, which is plural.
peHruS