tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon May 24 03:48:27 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: mojaq <-ta'>

• From: Carleton Copeland <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: mojaq <-ta'>
• Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 14:49:21 +-400

>jatlh qultoQ:  wa'leS vIchoHqa'ta'; wa'leS QaQchoHta'.

I'm probably just being dense, but adding qultoQ's translation to ghunchu'wI's explanation, I come up with:  "Tomorrow, it will again have been fixed.  Tomorrow it will have become good."  I may be stumbling over my own needlessly literal translation, but I wonder why a Klingon would say it this way rather than simply /wa'leS vIchoHqa'; wa'leS QaQchoH/.  Hope I'm not splitting hairs.

BTW, wej qultoQ De'qo' Daq choHlu'law'ta'.  "DaH Daqvam lo'lu'taHbe'" ghitlhlu'.

qa'ral

• Prev by Date: RE: mojaq <-jaj> <-ghach> je
• Next by Date: Appositive word order
• Prev by thread: RE: mojaq <-jaj> <-ghach> je
• Next by thread: Re: mojaq <-ta'>
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level