tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Mar 27 10:27:49 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: qama'

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: qama'
• Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 13:28:03 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

ja' peHruS:
>Here's is what I "got":  In order to understand Klingon more deeply, I look at
>many languages and see how the terms I read in TKD are used.

I wish I knew how to reach you and make you understand how absolutely wrong
this idea of yours is.  Your insistence on looking outside Okrand's works to
understand Klingon is like looking at textbooks on semiconductor theory and
electromagnetic propagation in order to understand an instruction manual for
a movie projector.  In your quest to understand Klingon, you are managing to
ignore what TKD says about how the terms are used.

>pab mu'mey Dayajqangbe'chugh, vaj tlhIngan Hol Dalo'Ha'bej.

'ej pab mu'mey DabuStaHvIS SoH, tlhIngan Hol DayajHa'ba' SoH.
Doch jatlhbogh Okrand Dayajbe'chugh, Okrand'e' yIyu'.
qech qelbogh Okrand Sovbe' Okrand mu'mey laDpu'be'bogh latlh'e'.

-- ghunchu'wI'

• References:
  • Re: qama'
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: qama'
• Next by Date: Re: Qapbe' DujwIj
• Prev by thread: Re: qama'
• Next by thread: Re: qama'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level