tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Mar 16 16:13:31 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: KLBC: bItam.
- From: "Andeen, Eric" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: KLBC: bItam.
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 17:16:22 -0700
jatlh Zrajm:
> De'vam yIlaD!
> chay' DaparHa'?
jISovbe'. jIyajbe'.
> * * *
>
> yIjatlh! SoHvaD vIjatlh.
> bItam.
> yIjatlh! vIjatlh.
> bItamqu'.
> yIjatlh! vItlhup.
> 'ach not bI'Ij.
> bItam.
> reH bItam.
>
> * * *
>
> Have I made any stupid grammatical errors?
Since you are not saying something specific, the prefixes should probably be
<jI-> rather than <vI->. Other than that, this is good.
pagh
Beginners' Grammarian