tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jun 10 09:00:12 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Klingon hanky-panky (KLBC)
- From: Carleton Copeland <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Klingon hanky-panky (KLBC)
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 20:01:17 +-400
ghel pagh:
>nuq 'oS <SIy'loH>? pong 'oH'a'?
De'qo' *Paramount Hol Guide*Daq vItu'. "seloh, SIy'loH: sexual intercourse (n) [From "Sins of the Father" (TNG)]" ghItlhlu'. vItobmeH mu'vam vIlo'. luj.
vIja':
>>mu'ghom wejDIchDaq /'e'/ vInoplaHpu''a'?
ghel pagh:
>nuq 'oH mu'ghom wejDIch'e' Daqelbogh?
*QInwIj mu'tlhegh wejDIch* vIjatlhnISpu'.
jatlh je' pagh:
>tlhIngan Hol mu'ghomna' 'ay' 6.2.5 yInuD.
tlhIngan Hol mu'ghomna' /KGT/ je' vIHutlh. qIb mIchvam SuylaHbe' vay'. De'wI' vIlo'taHvIS tlhIngan Hol vIghojtaH.
pagh, QInwIjDaq Qaghvam puS Datu'laH neH? mumer!
BTW, did /vInoplaHpu'/, /vIjatlhnISpu'/ and /vIqonnISbejta'/ correctly convey the intended senses of *could have* and *should have*?
qa'ral