tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jun 05 14:09:13 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Love

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: Love
• Date: Sat, 5 Jun 1999 17:08:49 EDT

In a message dated 6/2/1999 9:48:47 PM US Mountain Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:

<< Heghpu'be' Sarghvam.  rIQchu' neH. >>
===================
In that the verb suffix {-be'} negates the syllable immediately preceding it, 
is ghunchuwI' attempting to show that there is "incomplete completion of the 
event"?

peHruS

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Love
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Love (jIjegh!)
• Next by Date: Re: Love
• Prev by thread: Re: Love
• Next by thread: Re: Love
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level