Re: pab chu'

[Terrence Donnelly <pag000@mail.connect.more.net>]

I don't have a good feel for the concensus on this point.  It's
chear that words with {-wI'} can take some other verbal suffixes
(such as the word {wovmoHwI'} from the BOP poster), but I don't
know what, if any, restrictions exist.  Not using {-lu'} may be
a convention of the list, but I can't find a concise source for
the reason why.

-- ter'eS

At 09:58 PM 7/8/99 -0500, you wrote:
>In a message dated 7/8/1999 6:41:14 PM US Mountain Standard Time, 
>Eric.Andeen@Sequencia.com writes:
>
><< SKI: I recently posted some new pages to my Website containing a 
> > listing of all the grammar addenda and corrections post-TKD that 
> > I could find. You may find it interesting.  Let me know if I said 
> > something wrong or forgot your favorite bit. >>
>=======================
>Mark Shoulson once a long time ago answered my inquiry regarding using both 
>{-lu'} and {-wI'} on one verb stem.  He said NO.  Have there been any other 
>revelations on this point?  If yes, what are they?  From what source(s)?  
>Would you post this, too?
>
>peHruS
>
>