Re: pab chu'

[Terrence Donnelly <pag000@mail.connect.more.net>]

Or, to address your larger question: the CK material on time-telling
has been superceded by MO's later comments.  It happens; that's
just one of the joys of speaking Klingon.

I'll add a note somewhere to this effect on the webpage.

-- ter'eS

At 09:05 AM 7/9/99 -0500, charghwI' wrote:
>I'm going to try to beat voragh to the punch. {{:)> I just 
>happen to have an available copy of Okrand's post on how to 
>express what time it is:
>
[..]

>On Fri, 9 Jul 1999 09:32:34 -0400 Jeremy Silver 
><jeremy@mupwi.demon.co.uk> wrote:
[...]
>> I may be missing something - I am only a beginner after all.
>> 
>> Under:
>> Appendix: A Selected List of Useful Klingon Expressions
>> -
>> 1.Telling time:
>> -
>> You answer with a time label: rep wej "three A.M.";
>> 
>> CK list the time format as:
>> "Six Hundred Hours, or Six O'clock in the morning is: Six, jav, plus
>> hundred, vatlh, plus rep.
>> Altogether its   javvalth rep."
>> 
>> Which is more correct/canon?
>> Shouldnt both be listed?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> -- 
>>    Jeremy Silver   |\   jeremy@mupwi.demon.co.uk
>>  __________________| \  j.silver@elsevier.co.uk
>> |__________________|  | 
>>                    |  | A1200, Blizzard 1260, 34Mb
>>  mupwI' yI'uchtaH! |__| 1.4Gb HD. Amiga Forever.
>
>charghwI' 'utlh
>
>