tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jul 04 23:30:49 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: jIchegh tulajchugh



In a message dated 7/2/1999 9:48:05 PM US Mountain Standard Time, 
aranders@netusa1.net writes:

<< ja' peHruS:
 >Does {jIngaj} mean "I'll be brief," or "I'll be short (as in using only 
short
 >words)?"  I can't figure this one out, ghunchuwI'.  {ngaj} refers to "short
 >duration of time," stative verb.  Thus, I have to think that you are
 >attempting to take on the persona of time.  jImISqu.  yIQIj.
 
 qay' nuq?  Since you correctly understand the word {ngaj} as referring to
 time, I assume you would understand {jIngaj} as "I'll be brief" instead of
 "I'll be short (in physical distance)."  Thus I really have no idea what is
 confusing you, and I have no idea what you want me to explain.  Whatever it
 is that keeps us from communicating appears still to be in place.
 
 -- ghunchu'wI' >>
===================
You are absolutely correct that we still do not understand each other's 
thinking patterns.  You have not addressed the fact that I wrote that I feel 
that {jIngaj} implies that you are taking on the persona of time.  Time can 
be short in duration; I state that a person cannot.  You feel your meanings 
of Klingon words quite differently from the way I do.

peHruS



Back to archive top level