tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jan 13 13:17:31 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: chay' Dochmey vIjatlh?
- From: "Patrick Masterson" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: RE: chay' Dochmey vIjatlh?
- Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 13:16:58 PST
>Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 16:38:31 -0800 (PST)
>From: "Andeen, Eric" <Eric.Andeen@Sequencia.com>
>To: Multiple recipients of list <email@example.com>
>Subject: RE: chay' Dochmey vIjatlh?
>> Andeen, Eric wrote:
>>> lab K'ryntes:
>>> > chay' <more> vIjatlhlaH?
>>> > *lutmey <more> vIqonnIS* vIjatlh vIneH.
>>> The word <latlh> is just what you want. <latlh> is one of those
>>> <Hoch> that gets treated a little differently in the N-N
>>> goes in front of the other noun. "More stories" or "other stories"
>>> <latlh lutmey>.
>> So <latlh lut> would mean an additional story?
>> Does <latlh> mean "others" too? As in <latlhvaD jIvum.>.
>> I've seen it used that way. That would be, "I work for others."
>All by itself, <latlh> is "other, another". If the noun is obvious, as
>your example, it makes perfect sense to drop the noun and just use
Would I use latlh if I wanted to say, like "Give me another phaser," in
the sense of "Give me a different phaser" (perhaps the one I have
doesn't work, and I need a different one.) or would I use pIm?
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com