tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 05 11:17:44 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Noun suffixes, type 5
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Noun suffixes, type 5
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 15:44:59 -0500
From: William H. Martin <[email protected]>
>> I am proud of you should be SoHmo' jIHem.
>
>More likely, it would be something like {ta'lIjmo' jIHem.} with
>perhaps some reference as to why I get to be proud because of
>YOU. Shouldn't YOU be proud because of you?
>
>Anyway, I'd tend to lean more toward something like:
>
>mubelmoH ta'lIj.
'utbe' bel.
I think it is unlikely that a Klingon would say this. We've been told (in
KGT, I believe) that pleasure and enjoyment are not highly prized things to
Klingons.
I don't see any real problem with {SoHmo' jIHem}; any further disambiguation
seems like picking nits.
SuStel
Stardate 99011.3