tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jan 04 19:51:14 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: jIloStaHvIS
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: jIloStaHvIS
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 22:50:42 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
- Priority: NORMAL
Mostly, I was trying to make one of those rare uses of {chen}
without {-moH}. I still think it works, though I will accept the
more awkward, longer unnecessary reference to the making of the
object instead of the forming of it.
Another way to express it would be:
Sor Hap 'oH yoDvam Hap'e'.
I think it conveys the idea more clearly and concisely.
charghwI' 'utlh
On Wed, 30 Dec 1998 15:22:43 -0800 (PST) Terrence Donnelly
<[email protected]> wrote:
> At 02:04 PM 12/30/98 -0800, peHruS wrote:
> >In a message dated 12/29/1998 9:01:46 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
> >[email protected] writes:
> >
> ><< Sor Hapvo' chen yoD wa'DIch >>
> >
> >I prefer the way Chinese Mandarin expresses "made from":
> >
> >yoD wa'DIch chenmoHlu'meH Sor Hap lo'lu'
> >
> >I see {-vo'} working only for "going away from a location."
> >
>
> jIQochbe'qu'! mIwlIj vImaSbej.
>
> -- ter'eS