Re: jIloStaHvIS

["William H. Martin" <whm2m@server1.mail.virginia.edu>]

Mostly, I was trying to make one of those rare uses of {chen} 
without {-moH}. I still think it works, though I will accept the 
more awkward, longer unnecessary reference to the making of the 
object instead of the forming of it.

Another way to express it would be:

Sor Hap 'oH yoDvam Hap'e'.

I think it conveys the idea more clearly and concisely.

charghwI' 'utlh

On Wed, 30 Dec 1998 15:22:43 -0800 (PST) Terrence Donnelly 
<pag000@mail.connect.more.net> wrote:

> At 02:04 PM 12/30/98 -0800, peHruS wrote:
> >In a message dated 12/29/1998 9:01:46 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
> >whm2m@server1.mail.virginia.edu writes:
> >
> ><< Sor Hapvo' chen yoD wa'DIch >>
> >
> >I prefer the way Chinese Mandarin expresses "made from":
> >
> >yoD wa'DIch chenmoHlu'meH Sor Hap lo'lu'
> >
> >I see {-vo'} working only for "going away from a location."
> >
> 
> jIQochbe'qu'!  mIwlIj vImaSbej.
> 
> -- ter'eS