tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Feb 28 23:26:49 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Placement of aspect suffixes

In a message dated 2/25/1999 3:18:42 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
whm2m@server1.mail.virginia.edu writes:

<< qechmey vIchuptaHvIS
 > jIvIDbe' vIneH. 
 
 roD qechmey Dachupbe' neH. qechmeylIj motlhbe' DIlajchu' pIj 'e' 
 Daqapchu'. pIj bIvID. bISuv DaneHba'.  >>
====================

The above reply by charghwI' proves he is unwilling to accept peHruS'
willingness.  peHruS stated {jIvIDbe' vIneH} but charghwI' replies {pIj bIvID.
bISuv DaneHba'}.  Present "tense."

Thanks for misreading my message.  wejpuH.

peHruS

Back to archive top level