tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Feb 25 10:37:52 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Placement of aspect suffixes
- From: WestphalWz@aol.com
- Subject: Re: Placement of aspect suffixes
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 13:37:16 EST
In a message dated 2/24/1999 12:21:09 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
whm2m@server1.mail.virginia.edu writes:
<< You don't need to be a {Hur'Iq}. The circle is open if you will
but join it, supportive of all members rather than expecting all
members to support you as you present idea after idea after idea
without much concern for your hit rate or how interested others
may be in those ideas. It looks like the ideas are a shallow
excuse for attention. >>
jImuvqang 'e' vItlhoj. DaH DuDwI' 'oHbe' pongHeywIj'e'. qechmey vIchuptaHvIS
jIvIDbe' vIneH. vuDmey DIngachtaH 'ej yab vIq DIreH, 'ach maSuvchuqbe'.
peHruS