tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Feb 18 11:11:32 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: -pu'

• From: "Neal Schermerhorn" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: -pu'
• Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 14:15:41 -0500

>Sov 'e' neH 'Iv? tlhIngan jabbI'IDghomvam. naDevvo' jaH tera'ngan.

jIyajHa'ba'. yIjatlhqa'. (Not being a grammarian I will not comment on
*why*.)

>>It is a pain, that rule. You're not the first to think so. Join the club.
>
>qay''a' 'oH! vImuS!

vImuS je. qay'be'.

Qermaq

• Prev by Date: RE: jatlh
• Next by Date: Re: ma'veq: It's official
• Prev by thread: Re: -pu'
• Next by thread: qa'wIj Dotlh Dublu'law'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level