tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Feb 18 11:12:09 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: ma'veq: It's official

• From: TPO <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: ma'veq: It's official
• Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 14:11:55 -0500

>>ghorgh bIjatlhlaH, "I though (blah blah) at four o'clock."? bIjatlhlaHbe'.
>>mu'tlheghvetlh vIlajleHbe'.
>
>You messed up your prefixes, it should say:
>
><chorgh "I thought (blah blah) at four o'clock." DajatlhlaH? DajatlhlaHbe'.
>mu'tlheghvetlh vIlajleHbe'.>

(ghorgh, not chorgh; -laH, not -leH)

The first prefixes are correct.
The quote, the words which are actually spoken, are not the object of jatlh.

"blah blah" bIjatlh  and  bIjatlh "blah blah"  are correct.

A non-quote verbal thing can be the object...

mu'tlheghvetlh Dajatlh
SoQ Dajatlh
Holvetlh Dajatlh


DloraH

• Prev by Date: Re: -pu'
• Next by Date: qa'wIj Dotlh Dublu'law'
• Prev by thread: Re: ma'veq: It's official
• Next by thread: Re: ma'veq: It's official
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level