tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 16 11:31:28 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: KLBC: jupwI' chong
> jabbI'IDghomvam laD jupwI'. tlhIngan Hol ghoj neH ghaH.
> wej jabbI'IDghomDaq ghItlhbe' ghaH.
You've just used a double negative, which is no better in Klingon than
English - drop the <-be'>. I also think <lab> is better than <ghItlh> for
posting a message to the list.
> mata'DI' maghoj.
> jabbI'IDghomDaq ghItlhnIS ghaH qar'a'?
ghoj ghaH neHchugh, vaj ghItlhnISbej. po'choHlu'meH, qeqnISlu'ba'.
> juppu', jabbI'IDghomvamDaq yIghItlh 'ej
maj. Of course, since you are using a no object prefix, it should be the
> jabbI'IDghomDaq ghItlh ghaH 'e' ghaH yItungHa'.
This part doesn't work. I really don't know what you're going for with the
<'e'> bit, but here is a suggestion for how to fix it: <... labwI'pu'