tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Feb 10 09:42:05 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Monster verb construction - does this work?
> Well, I'd personally be tempted to pair it with your favorite
> noun thing
jImon. That was where I was heading when I put the beast together - but
the monstrosity was so convoluted ....
> and make a sentence, like this Klingon equivalent to
> "How are things going with your wife?" while addressing someone
> who has been complaining lately about marital problems, spoken
> to both members of the marriage:
>
> QaghHommeyHeyrajmo' Sungaghchuqqangqa'moHlaHbe'chu'taHneS'a'?
>
> "Your honors, are you, because of your apparent little errors,
> still perfectly unable to cause each other to again be willing
> to mate?"
>
> Not bad for two words.
Yes... uh, but for a Community Ed class where I might use this as
an example... maybe "yaj" would be better than "ngagh".
> > d'Armond's pojwI' didn't blink at this and yielded:
>
> pojwI' never blinks.
Well - sometimes it crashes. Or complains, but that is a matter of suffix
ordering error.
> pojwI' is a great way to quickly look up words. The task of
> interpreting affix combinations is a substantial one, however...
bIlughbej.