tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 02 13:49:34 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: loDpu'
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: loDpu'
- Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 21:47:51 -0500
From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
>[naDev law' loDpu'. loD law' nIv be' law' QIv.]
>
>It's a straighforward comparative construction. TKD section 6.6 explains
>the {A Q law' B Q puS} formula. Since I was already using the verb {law'}
>in the Q slot, I decided not to use {law'} and {puS} themselves as the
>opposites, and I went with one of the alternatives that TKW tells us is
>sometimes used "as a form of word play" (pages 178-180).
Well then, you make a really great sentence for all the wrong reasons!
SuStel
Stardate 99088.6