tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 02 13:49:34 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: loDpu'

From: Alan Anderson <>

>[naDev law' loDpu'.  loD law' nIv be' law' QIv.]
>It's a straighforward comparative construction.  TKD section 6.6 explains
>the {A Q law' B Q puS} formula.  Since I was already using the verb {law'}
>in the Q slot, I decided not to use {law'} and {puS} themselves as the
>opposites, and I went with one of the alternatives that TKW tells us is
>sometimes used "as a form of word play" (pages 178-180).

Well then, you make a really great sentence for all the wrong reasons!

Stardate 99088.6

Back to archive top level