tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Dec 25 19:45:01 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: RE: KLBC: wa'Hu'

• From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: RE: KLBC: wa'Hu'
• Date: Sat, 25 Dec 1999 22:51:15 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
• Priority: NORMAL

See:

http://www.kli.org

Look for the New Words List. You should find these and 
others there.

charghwI'

On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 19:58:33 -0500 (EST) 
[email protected] wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> pagh wrote:
> >Good question. <wa'Hu'> can obviously be a single word - it's in the
> >dictionary that way. Based on the fact that <ben>, <nem>, <waQ>, <wen>,
> ><Hu'>, and <leS> are all nouns, we have every reason to believe they can
> >also be used on their own, with or without a number in front of them. 
> 
> What's <waQ> and <wen>?  Presumably "months ago/from now".  I only have
> <waQ> = "obstruct" in my dictionary.  Where are <waQ> and <wen> from?
> 
> --
> De'vID
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Get free personalized email at http://yahoo.iname.com

• Prev by Date: Re: {qIm} and {qImHa'}
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC, Comparatives & Superlatives
• Prev by thread: RE: KLBC: wa'Hu'
• Next by thread: KLBC: 'IH yIn
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level