tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Dec 23 21:08:13 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: QISmaS (was RE: RE: Samhain [Off Topic] (was:RE: qISmaS)[veering back on topic])

ja' pagh:
>>> Sorchaj luneH neH. 'IHmoHlaw'meH,
>>> SorDaq 'aH law' lulan.
>> <<lulan>>?
>This brings up an interesting question. Is <'aH> inherently plural, like its
>English translation. If so, then <lulan> is correct.

I disagree.  I think putting {law'} on it makes it grammatically plural,
whether or not it was inherently plural to begin with.

-- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh

Back to archive top level