tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Dec 12 19:51:58 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Nautical Directions/Navigation

• From: SuSvaj <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Nautical Directions/Navigation
• Date: Sun, 12 Dec 1999 23:11:40 -0500

At 04:23 PM 12/12/99 -0500, you wrote:
>changing wI- to ma- doesn't make it clipped.
>with or without -Daq, it should be wI-.

No.  That's not what I meant.  I meant that the sentence can be
interpereted as:

   "nImbuS wej maghoS"  We are going to Nimbus III.  "He yInab."  Plot the
course.



>
>If you do use ma- then you have to use -Daq, 

Not so.  When useing "ghoS", the "Daq" suffix is not requiered.

SuSvaj


but this would mean that you
>are already on Nimbus III; and that's not what was wanted here.
>
>
>DloraH
>
>
>

• Follow-Ups:
  • KLBC: jIchegh
    • From: [email protected] (Regina Reusser)
  • Re: Nautical Directions/Navigation
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Nautical Directions/Navigation
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC: A construction that seems...unusual.
• Prev by thread: Re: Nautical Directions/Navigation
• Next by thread: KLBC: jIchegh
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level